But then her answer took a turn I wasn't expecting:
"If, as is the case in our culture, the younger women are having trouble finding and marrying godly husbands, then helping them do that should be the first order of business on the older women's to-do lists."
So you're saying we bring back the Matchmaker? Oh yeah...
"Instead of asking, 'Do you think I'm ready for marriage?' you might say, 'I believe, based on what I read in Scripture, that believers are called either to celibate service or marriage (Matthew 19:11-12). I know from my desires and drives that I'm not specially gifted for celibate service, so what I'm wondering is, based on your understanding of Scripture, what are the things I need to be working on to prepare for the responsibilities that come with marriage and motherhood?'"
Matchmaking, then, goes beyond just having an eye for which individuals might "click." More importantly, it involves a mentoring relationship in which those doing the matching are also caring for, encouraging, and reprimanding, when appropriate, the young woman in question. Single women should have trans-generational relationships with women who are edifying them. And should said women happen to know an eligible gentleman, perhaps they arrange an introduction..
So really, in LA, especially at a church like Shoreline, where the older women are like...still only my big brother's age, how would this actually look? The whole idea has brought up lots of questions for me. Personally, I've always liked the concept of the matchmaker and often tell people that if it were socially acceptable, I'd just let my parents pick someone for me. (Actually, the truth is, if I planned to move back to College Station, they already have a short list of potential suitors) But nowadays we end up having to do our own matchmaking, which either looks like us going for whatever sort of guys we actually meet, or taking upon ourselves the more elaborate screening process of navigating the online dating scene. We like having control. We also like believing that we would make the best choices on our behalf, whether we actually have the maturity to do so or not.
But really, what if I do open up the option of matchmaking for some people I know? I know plenty of people who would love to try their hand at setting people up. Usually they keep out of other people's "business" because a lot of people find being set up on blind dates both offensive and potentially awkward (at best) or terrifying. There's no way of knowing what kind of socially inept guy they're gonna throw at you (because we naturally assume that the kinds of guys willing to be set up on dates are equally as pathetic as we feel for not being able to find our own beaus). Conceptually, the idea feels flawed.
But I would propose a few rules that might allow for successful matchmaking in our 21st century dating scene:
1. Find someone you trust. It's imperative that the person who's doing the matchmaking be someone who has your best interests in mind--and by that I don't mean, they'll look for the hottest of hotties, but that they love the Lord and want to see you grow more in Him, not just score some arm candy.
2. Make sure they know you. The person who is setting up your matches should know enough about you to know what types of people you might enjoy spending time with. Stop being surface level with them. You'll waste your time.
3. Throw out your expectations. I don't care what kind of list you made in 9th grade of what you think you want in a man. If you've followed Rules 1 and 2, then give Mr. Datey McDaterson a try. It's possible that other people can see more about what kind of guy would suit you well than you yourself could.
4. Can your pride. Allowing someone to arrange a date for you does not make you lame. You live in LA. You have a job in which you interact with the four cubicles around you. Your friends know people that you don't. It's called networking. If it makes you feel better, throw dinner parties and casually have friends bring people you don't know. If dating ensues, then you know, whatever...
So that's all I've got so far. If you're like the girl from the article, if you want to be married and you consider your singleness a "problem," then do something about it. Bring on the matchmaker...catch yourself a catch. Find yourself a find. Fiddle with an old school ritual and see what kinds of riches await you.
Matchmaking, then, goes beyond just having an eye for which individuals might "click." More importantly, it involves a mentoring relationship in which those doing the matching are also caring for, encouraging, and reprimanding, when appropriate, the young woman in question. Single women should have trans-generational relationships with women who are edifying them. And should said women happen to know an eligible gentleman, perhaps they arrange an introduction..
So really, in LA, especially at a church like Shoreline, where the older women are like...still only my big brother's age, how would this actually look? The whole idea has brought up lots of questions for me. Personally, I've always liked the concept of the matchmaker and often tell people that if it were socially acceptable, I'd just let my parents pick someone for me. (Actually, the truth is, if I planned to move back to College Station, they already have a short list of potential suitors) But nowadays we end up having to do our own matchmaking, which either looks like us going for whatever sort of guys we actually meet, or taking upon ourselves the more elaborate screening process of navigating the online dating scene. We like having control. We also like believing that we would make the best choices on our behalf, whether we actually have the maturity to do so or not.
But really, what if I do open up the option of matchmaking for some people I know? I know plenty of people who would love to try their hand at setting people up. Usually they keep out of other people's "business" because a lot of people find being set up on blind dates both offensive and potentially awkward (at best) or terrifying. There's no way of knowing what kind of socially inept guy they're gonna throw at you (because we naturally assume that the kinds of guys willing to be set up on dates are equally as pathetic as we feel for not being able to find our own beaus). Conceptually, the idea feels flawed.
But I would propose a few rules that might allow for successful matchmaking in our 21st century dating scene:
1. Find someone you trust. It's imperative that the person who's doing the matchmaking be someone who has your best interests in mind--and by that I don't mean, they'll look for the hottest of hotties, but that they love the Lord and want to see you grow more in Him, not just score some arm candy.
2. Make sure they know you. The person who is setting up your matches should know enough about you to know what types of people you might enjoy spending time with. Stop being surface level with them. You'll waste your time.
3. Throw out your expectations. I don't care what kind of list you made in 9th grade of what you think you want in a man. If you've followed Rules 1 and 2, then give Mr. Datey McDaterson a try. It's possible that other people can see more about what kind of guy would suit you well than you yourself could.
4. Can your pride. Allowing someone to arrange a date for you does not make you lame. You live in LA. You have a job in which you interact with the four cubicles around you. Your friends know people that you don't. It's called networking. If it makes you feel better, throw dinner parties and casually have friends bring people you don't know. If dating ensues, then you know, whatever...
So that's all I've got so far. If you're like the girl from the article, if you want to be married and you consider your singleness a "problem," then do something about it. Bring on the matchmaker...catch yourself a catch. Find yourself a find. Fiddle with an old school ritual and see what kinds of riches await you.